Although I have known that the Avachinsky is one of the more active volcanoes in Kamchatka, somehow I habitually tended to skip it when checking webcams and reports for new activity in Kamchatka – I saw forever this owl face, this snow-covered, never-changing mountain… That has changed since I came across this wonderful diary by a 19th century German-Baltic geologist and explorer, K. v. Ditmar. He had lived and worked 1851-55 in Petropavlovsk, at the foot of two magnificent volcanoes. Although he didn’t manage to get to the crater – bad weather, strong gas emissions and superstitious company made him abandon two attempts – he loved volcanoes!

From left: Koryaksky, Avachinsky, and Kozelsky volcanoes seen from Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. (© kuhnmi via Wikimedia)
On picture postcards both Avachinsky and Koryaksky stratovolcanoes seem to tower directly over the city of Petropavlovsk. Yet they reside 22 km NE and 26 km N of the city resp., and their summits are separated by 12 km. They are part of the Avachinskaya volcano group, a NW-SE-trending chain of stratovolcanoes north of Petropavlovsk. Seen from the city, 3456-m-high Koryaksky volcano is on the left, 2741-m-high Avachinsky at the right center, and 2189 m parasitic Kozhel or Kozelsky volcano at the extreme right. Koryaksky has had only a few minor eruptions during historical time while Avachinsky is one of Kamchatka’s most active volcanoes. Their glacier-covered slopes are dissected by steep erosion valleys, except for the smoother, active Young Cone in the center of Avachinsky.
As Ditmar says in his book, the whole area around Avacha Bay bears witness to the powerful forces that have caused the greatest upheavals. Outcrops of massive lava flows of different compositions, great masses of debris tumbled down from the volcanoes, huge boulders, high cliffs and deep ravines characterize the landscape. Everywhere, hot springs and fumaroles tell of the still ongoing volcanic activity.
THE VOLCANO
A word about the naming first: You may find for the volcano
– Avachinskaya Sopka or Goryelaya Sopka
(sopka = small mountain/volcano)
– Avachinsky vulkan (Авачинский вулкан)
– Avacha, Awatscha or Avacha Volcano (Авачa)
Its new cone is mostly called
– Young Cone, or
– Avachi Cone
On the tectonics of this area please see agimarc’s post Tectonics of the Kamchatka Peninsula from 03/2015.
The building stages of the present volcano follow one of the general patterns: the first eruptions created an ancestral volcano. Later, during the Pleistocene, the formation of a large horseshoe-shaped caldera and its inner graben destroyed this old volcano. Following this sector collapse, lava domes, and eventually the present Avachi (or Young) cone, were built up inside the caldera, making it a so-called Somma volcano like Vesuvius. The top of Avachi is where the presently active crater has squeezed out an enormous cow pad of a lava dome again.
The rim of the old caldera is breached to the SW, resulting from a major debris avalanche about 30k-40k years ago. It has buried an area of about 500 km² to the south – this is the ground on which today the city of Petropavlovsk is built.

The Avachi cone rising within the Avachinsky caldera. Seen from the S, through the breach in the caldera walls. (© Игорь Вржещ, screenshot fr. Google Maps)
36 holocene eruptions before historical records have been scientifically determined by tephrochronology or radiocarbon dating, beginning at 6100 BCE. At this time the eruptive center was probably formed by coalesced extrusive domes nested in the collapse crater (similar to modern Young Shiveluch). Nine of those eruptions were quite large, with VEIs of 4 and 5. They were strong and catastrophic explosive events of plinian and sub-plinian types: massive tephra outputs, extended pyroclastic flows (up to 15-17 km long) and “scorching clouds” over 20 km destroyed everything in their path as well as powerful lahars up to 35 km length. Andesitic pumice varieties made up the main constituent of the erupted materials. Tephra deposits have been found of currently 10-15 m thickness in 8 km distance from the crater.
Dramatic changes in the activity of Avachinsky occurred about 4000 years ago, when lava of a more basic, andesitic-basaltic composition began to surface. At this time the Young Cone began to form; eruptions became more frequent and weaker. In general, the volcanic danger from Avachinsky decreased in comparison with the previous “andesitic” stage.

Prior to the 1991 eruption, the summit of Avachinsky volcano contained this steep-walled crater that was about 250 m deep. (© Yuri Doubik/Institute of Volcanology, Petropavlovsk)
From 1737 on, 19 more (more or less severe) eruptions have been witnessed and recorded by people. A noteworthy (VEI=4) explosive event occurred at Avachinsky in 1945. This created a steep walled crater with a diameter of 330 m and 260 m deep. As a result of the weak eruption in 1991, this deep crater in the cone completely filled up to the brim, and overflowing, with lava. The hardened plug now forms the “cow pad” of a lava dome, with countless fumaroles around its edge. This eruption also produced lava flows and mudflows. The last confirmed eruption – just a minor ash emission – was in 2001.

View along the crater rim of Avachinsky volcano with Koryaksky volcano in the background. 09/2014 (© kuhnmi via Wikimedia)
The last we heard from Avachinsky was on 10 May 2008: that the Tokyo VAAC reported an eruption plume from Avachinsky which rose to an altitude of 4.3 km a.s.l. However, KVERT did not detect ash on satellite imagery nor by direct observation.
TRAVELLERS & EXPLORERS
As with many far eastern volcanoes, knowledge of their existence and activities came to the western world by those travellers who didn’t actually look for them. They were generally hunting for riches in unexplored realms and trying to find the shortest routes to get them home. Captain Cook, Vitius Bering, Karl von Ditmar are just a few names of those who reported about volcanoes. Bering and part of his crew were lost and actually died on an island off Kamchatka, I think they’ve seen a lot of erupting volcanoes on the main land before they eventually starved to death.
So why did I mention PAUL in the title? Because the volcanos’ native names were not known to the rest of the world, seafarers called them Peter and Paul. This was still known to Ditmar in 1851. In the Journal of Captain Cook’s Last Voyage, John Ledyard records the eruption of Avachinsky on June 15, 1779:

An ash column rises above the summit crater of Avachinsky volcano on January 16, 1991. (© Oleg Volynets)
“On the 15th it continued calm until noon when it clouded up and became very black and dark: the two mountains Peter and Paul were covered with the atmosphere near half way from their summits down, and at two o’clock we had again a small shock of an earthquake, and heard a hollow rumbling noise in the air, and the atmosphere continuing to condense, it became almost as dark as night, and the face of heaven looked very wild: we singled the stops of the sheet-anchor and eased the ship aloft at all the portentous appearances. Between three and four the mountain Paul exploded with a tremendous shock that convulsed everything around us: The report that attended the explosion was very loud at first, but gradually decreased until it subsided to a sound like that of grumbling distant thunder.” [Zug, James, ed. (2005), The Last Voyage of Captain Cook…]

Hikers leisurely perambulating along Avachinsky’s crater rim in this otherworldly (or rather hellish) ambience… probably warm and cosy too 😉 . (© Travel Company Volcanoes Land)
Karl von Ditmar (1822-1892) was a Baltic-German geologist and explorer of Kamchatka in 1851-55. He, as an exception, was very interested in volcanoes. For example, he had been convinced that the smaller, parasitic stratovolcano Kozhel, on the SE flank of Avachinsky, must have been a part of the ancient volcano (so much so that he never gets tired in emphasizing it with every mention). Taking it to be the eastern flank of the somma, and extending the flank line upwards to meet another line from the westernmost flank he would get a triangle depicting a huge volcano, much higher than neighboring Koryaksky and even larger than Klyuchevsky! (which of course is not the case).
To support his theory he then relates an eyewitness story:
“This would also completely agree with the statement of the old Maschigin. He told me about a very terrible event that had happened about 25 years ago*. The Avacha Volcano, which used to be significantly higher than the Koryakskaya, suddenly collapsed with the most terrible crash and tremendous tremors. The sun had darkened, and a huge ash rain had fallen far and wide and formed so deep layers that all grass was heavily overflowed, that tree branches broke and bushes were depressed. Fire columns had risen high to the sky, and huge lava flows had erupted. (It seems that this outburst was that which took place in 1828*, of which Kittlitz and Erman tell.) […] Sheep, sable, marmots and wild reindeer were once in abundance, and a hunt there had always been rich in prey. Now everything is dead, yes, he even could no longer orient himself in this chaos of new formations. Huge blocks, mighty layers of ash, deep crevices and large lava flows are now to be seen in places where previously had been soft mats covered with juicy herbs.”
*I am sure it was not the small event of 1828 but that of 1827, which was a VEI=4 eruption. That must have been terrible indeed for the population when Petropavlovsk was already an important port town.
Von Ditmar made two attempts on climbing Avachinsky. On the first, he didn’t get far when the weather became threatening. On the second, it was a great day and he and his companions went up to the foot of the Young cone. Here his two men balked. There was no way to get them go one step further up. So he went on his own, climbing up straight over rough debris and then on slippery smooth lava surface. Just before he reached the crater the sulfur smell became unbearable and he had to turn back without having seen what he so badly had wanted to see.
CURRENT STATE

The lava dome in Avachinsky’s crater, with Koryaksky volcano in the background. (© Mag. Elisabeth Veverka, via kamchatka.cc)
Currently, the volcano is in a stage of reduced eruptive intensity, which began in 1945. However, its enormous rigid plug in the crater now poses the danger of a more explosive eruption next time round. Scientists expect it to turn out similar to the 1737 and 1827 eruptions, which were VEI=3 and VEI=4 resp.. The explosivity will depend on repose time and magma supply. The longer the time, the stronger becomes the plug. The more magma presses against it from below, the stronger the eruption will be. Also, changes in the volatile components of the magma can play a role, as well as several other factors. In any case, collapses and directed explosions associated with them are possible, which are caused by the present obstruction of the vent.
HOW DANGEROUS IS LIFE FOR THE PETROPAVLOVIANS ?
The answer is: It could be alright, you know, but you never know, and you’d better err on the cautious side.

Detail of a section of soil & pyroclastic layers, 25 km SE from Avachinsky’s crater. Tephras from: АВ – Avachinsky (Young cone 1945 & 1200), КШт3 – Ksudach (1907), ОП – Opala volcano (w/ ‘years ago’ for prehistoric events). (2000; from: Bazanova et al., 2001)
An assessment paper by Bazanova et al. from 2001 finds the following: The activities of the Young Cone have remained quite the same for most of its 4000-year life, and there is no reason to believe that significant changes will occur in the next 200-300 years. Unless – there is an unforeseen, fundamental restructuring of the volcano’s power system as a result of some catastrophic events. After the initial ~500 years of particularly catastrophic explosive “birth pains”, the eruptions ranged between severe and weak explosive to effusive events up to date. Over the past 3,500 years, there have been at least 26 strong eruptions, among them at least 5 eruptions of the type of 1945 (with a tephra volume of about 0.25-0.5 km³). But yes, even moderate eruptions can affect the city of Petropavlovsk.
There is not too much to fear from lava flows and hot ash-and-block avalanches – they are usually limited to the cone of the volcano, only occasionally going down to its foot in the upper reaches of the dry river valleys.

Avachinsky volcano on January 17, 1991. View from the SW. Lava, filling up the crater, flows over the rim onto the slope of the cone. Clearly visible mud flows (lahars) descend to its foot. (© I.A. Nesmachnovo; from: Bazanova et al., 2001, labels translated)
Fortunately, investigations of historical ash layers show that the city is located in what appears to be a dead angle, or lee side, between the main directions of ash dispersal. That means it is not in a position to take the brunt of ash falls. Quite another story are pyroclastic flows and especially lahars. PFs have been found to reach up to 20 km from the crater in the past, while lahars repeatedly descended 30 km or more along the dry river valleys. Lahars represent a significant threat in the future, during eruptions of almost all types.

Upper image left: Pyroclastic flow of 1827 in the valley Pady Lavovaya. To the right is a terasse of 1000-year-old lahar deposits that descended during an eruption of the Young Cone. Images А, Б show details of the outcrops. 8 km from the crater. (© A.A. Ovsyannikov, 1992; from: Bazanova et al., 2001)
From the extensive description of the Hazard Map I will only cite this paragraph: “The danger zone only for the lahars during catastrophic eruptions will capture a vast territory (13×10 km) in the west of the region where the airport is located, and residential houses and industrial facilities of the Elizovo suburbs. The height of the mudflow front in a catastrophic eruption may reach 6 m or more here. The so-called ‘Bomb Field’ section, which is the peripheral part of the Zheltuha River Cone, is also a dangerous area in the event of a very strong eruption.”
Hazard Map
Legend to Hazard Map
Bazanova et al. conclude with this astounding statement:
“The probability of catastrophic eruptions of the type that occurred at the beginning of the formation of the Young Cone is very small. However, it is impossible to completely exclude such events in the case of a powerful regional injection of magmatic matter within the entire Eastern Volcanic Zone, which will undoubtedly manifest itself in a sharp increase in the activity of the Avachinsky volcano.”
Now this set me thinking… magma injection “within the entire Eastern Volcanic Zone” of Kamchatka? Is that what could happen – or is it a prank of Google translate? Good that the Yellow Press hasn’t seen that yet! For me it has cut out my homework: finding out why and how and if at all such an event would be in the cards. Any idea where to start? Please let me know.
~~~
Disclaimer: I am not a scientist, all information in this (and any of my other posts) is gleaned from the www and/or from books I have read, so hopefully from people who do get things right! 🙂 If you find something not quite right, or if you can add some more interesting stuff, please leave a comment.
Enjoy! – GRANYIA
SOURCES & FURTHER READING
– GVP; Avachinsky
– Holocene Volcanoes in Kamchatka; Avachinsky
– Tectonics of the Kamchatka Peninsula (VH)
– Potential danger from the eruptions of Avachinsky volcano (in Russian; includes the extensive description of the Hazard Map)
– Paleotsunami Travels/Avachinsky (Jody Bourgeois’ Blog)
– Karl v. Ditmar, Travels part I (PDF, German)
– Karl v. Ditmar, Travels part II (PDF, German)
Preprint of The volcano-tectonic crisis of 2018 east of Mayotte, Comoros islands. Granyia hit on some very current stuff. Cheers –
https://eartharxiv.org/d46xj?fbclid=IwAR1Qko8QcBQuIiuogm37FDRNs5U-6EiVZHKt_y0aRNUmL5-8Lk8vvcXXSd8
LikeLike
Also this, by Laure Fallou and Rémy Bossu: “Taking into account the cultural context to improve scientific communication – Lessons learned from earthquakes in Mayotte”
https://blogs.egu.eu/divisions/sm/2019/03/08/taking-into-account-the-cultural-context-to-improve-scientific-communication-lessons-learned-from-earthquakes-in-mayotte/
LikeLike
Hi
thanks for the link on Mayotte.
Just to point out 2 mooc courses on volcanology.
one on Coursera on seismology and one on Edx on volcano monitoring.
The first one is a bit math/python oriented (but very interesting), the second one seems for the moment much more accessible and is speaking of Icelandic volcanoes. Both can be followed for free, but you’ll need to pay to get a certificate.
LikeLike
Thanks, dfm, yes I had heard but forgotten about the Edx course; so I have enrolled today and completed the first module. I was amazed to see the lecturers: it reads like the Who is Who of Icelandic volcanologists. I won’t buy a certificate, though. Are you doing the Coursera one?
LikeLike
Nov 30 Anchorage earthquake was revised upwards to a M 7.1. Aftershocks are spreading out a bit and things have been relatively quiet. Cheers –
https://earthquake.alaska.edu/november-30-anchorage-earthquake-revised-magnitude-71
LikeLike
Interesting paper out of EurekaAlert. Major tectonic sutures in the tropics tied to ice ages. Mechanism seems to be oceanic rock lifted above the ocean surface which weathers and removes sufficient CO2 from the atmosphere to plunge global temps into ice age conditions. Over time, those uplifted sea bottom rocks chemically change to the point where that reaction no longer takes place and the ice age sequence stops. Current active suture is Indonesia. This only works if you believe CO2 levels are the cause of ice ages. Have seen similar theories blaming current ice age sequence (last 35 Ma) on the formation of the Himalayas which disrupt the E-W global air flow. A third theory has the closure of Central America at Panama as disrupting E-W currents between the Pacific and Atlantic. The more you know. The more you don’t know. Interesting reading nonetheless. h/t WUWT and Dennis Wingo. Cheers –
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2019-03/miot-tit031219.php
LikeLike